Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns (codeberg.org)

71 points by Cider9986 5 hours ago

18 comments:

by MostlyStable an hour ago

The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better, by a lot. I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.

by throooooo 29 minutes ago

Seriously. The UX/UI on Twitter has always been a dumpster fire.

by arjie 35 minutes ago

Yeah, but most of these will fall. I used to use one or two of these to scrape my friends' posts because I stopped using Twitter and they'd inevitably all disappear in time. It's like chasing the latest TPB. In the end, I just logged in a headless browser and told an agent to fetch daily.

by sampullman 21 minutes ago

That's true, but TBP has been going pretty strong for over 2 decades. It can be hard to totally shut something down, if people want it.

by Cider9986 7 minutes ago

Wdym "chasing the latest TPB"? Isn't 1337x and others better and offer a complete alternative?

Twitter is different there's many stories that are only there.

by done_lurking 30 minutes ago

What is TPB?

by corvad 3 hours ago

I guess X never heard of the Streisand effect...

by agnosticmantis 3 hours ago

Any user scripts that automatically redirect to a working instance?

by add-sub-mul-div 3 hours ago

We could stop thinking of them as walled gardens we're trying to get into and start thinking of them as quarantines for the Eternal September population.

by delichon 3 hours ago

> quarantines for the Eternal September population

Hacker News actually has a way to do this quarantine, a version that only counts votes from accounts created before 2008: https://news.ycombinator.com/classic. About a decade after Eternal September started, but not bad.

by bananaflag 43 minutes ago

Wow that's very interesting but it only works for the front page (and also only changes the order not the numbers), not for each comment page.

Maybe we should have a setting "count only votes before date yyyy-mm-dd" but this would probably make the site too dynamic (?) and consume a lot of resources.

by defrost 3 hours ago

FWiW as an aside, it appears to count votes from December 2008 accounts (as just tested using this 2008-12-26 account).

So that's at least strictly before 2009.

by randallsquared an hour ago

Decade and a half, really. Eternal September was 1993 or 1994, right?

by Petersipoi 4 hours ago

Awesome. Let's all start using this on HN so we end up with a bunch of broken links in a few years

by dadoum 3 hours ago

They would become links with only a wrong domain, so I am not very worried about that personally.

by bigbadfeline 2 hours ago

> a bunch of broken links in a few years

Who cares, by that time the originals and their copies would be a lot less worthy of viewing.

Data from: Hacker News, provided by Hacker News (unofficial) API